Combating elite Manhattan political ideologies on climate change, the purpose of government, New York state news, and the basic principles of economics.
When a new President comes into office, there is quite properly a changing of the guard.
The people have voted for new policies. The norm is that all the Cabinet Secretaries, and all other Cabinet-level officials (like the heads of EPA, NSA and NASA, and the UN Ambassador) leave office, to be replaced by appointees of the new guy.
But there are exceptions. The two most notable are the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the Director of the FBI.
The word “insurrection” has been liberally applied in the press to describe the January 6, 2021, Capitol Hill riot that ended with intrusion by demonstrators into the Capitol Building.
If the word “insurrection” can be applied there, then how about to the current efforts of federal bureaucrats to insulate themselves and their chosen policies from the control of newly re-elected President Trump?
In this post on October 1 (title: “The Greater ‘Threat To Democracy’ — Part III: Democrats Rule Even If Republicans Win”), I discussed multiple instances of efforts within the Biden administration to insulate its policies from getting changed by a new administration elected by the voters. Examples discussed in that post included efforts at NIH and EPA to entrench the idea that “The Science” somehow requires continuation of the policies of the current administration on things like Covid and climate change.
In that post, I promised more examples to come. Here is a small roundup:
Just when you think that things might be about to turn around with regard to the explosion of unbelievably stupid laws and regulations to harass and annoy the people, along comes another one that’s stupid enough to top them all.
This one has sprung up seemingly out of nowhere in the past few weeks, in notices that have gone out among the New York co-op and condo communities. But the law’s application is far broader than just these communities. I suspect that many readers have received such notices in many diverse contexts.
The law in question is a federal statute called the Corporate Transparency Act.
Over the past two weeks, President-elect Trump has engaged in rapid-fire announcements of his picks for the cabinet and other top positions.
Among the announced selections are Trump’s nominees for the three top positions in climate and energy policy: EPA Administrator (Lee Zeldin), Secretary of Energy (Chris Wright), and Secretary of the Interior (Doug Burgum). In this post I will take a first look at these nominees.
Without doubt, these three Trump appointees will be an enormous improvement over the Biden administration functionaries they will replace (EPA Administrator Michael Regan, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland). The three outgoing Bidenauts are all committed fanatic climate warriors, fighting every day to restrict development and use of hydrocarbon fuels, and thus to make America weaker and Americans poorer. Having them in office has been like having the country’s energy policy under the control of a cabal of its worst enemies.
But is there anything about President-elect Trump’s nominees for these positions that we should be at least somewhat concerned about?
If you believe the messaging of the Trump transition, big cuts in U.S. government spending are coming. Announced cabinet appointments include several who are opponents of the mission of the agencies they will soon be heading. A new Department of Government Efficiency is to be created, headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, with instructions to take an ax to wasteful programs.
But, assuming that some big cuts actually get implemented, you know what inevitably comes next: Because all government spending is (foolishly) counted as a 100% addition to GDP, the cuts first get recorded as a decline in GDP. Economists on the left (e.g., Krugman) then immediately scream that the cuts have failed, the country has gone into recession, and the people are suffering.
In recent U.S. experience, the Republicans have never had the political fortitude to stay the course.
But let’s look at the latest news from Argentina.
The overwhelming focus of the environmental movement over the past three decades and more has been the push to eliminate the use of hydrocarbon fuels and transform the world’s energy system into something based on supposedly cleaner wind and sun.
This effort has always been doomed to failure, because energy produced by wind and sun does not work satisfactorily and is wildly too expensive. So it has long been obvious to the well-informed that this whole effort will inevitably go away at some point. But after the desperate cries of crisis and alarm from thousands of activists for decades on end, and after the trillions of dollars government funds invested, how could that possibly occur?
My prediction has long been that at some point the whole thing would just quietly fade away, as if it had never happened.
Combating elite Manhattan political ideologies on climate change, the purpose of government, New York state news, and the basic principles of economics.
Permission to use content on this site is hereby granted freely to all, provided that any such use is accompanied by attribution and link.
Daughter Jane Menton has become a regular contributor. Watch for her byline. I hope you enjoy her posts.
Comments are welcome and encouraged on this website. However, I reserve the right to delete any comment that I deem inappropriate for any reason.
If you want to support this website:
From time to time readers ask how they can support this website. The site itself does not need or accept outside financial support. However, I encourage support of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. Full disclosure: I am on the Board, and am the President, of the American Friends affiliate of this organization. To learn more about the organization, you can go to its website here. To make a contribution, you can go to its “donate” page here. If you are a U.S. taxpayer and would like to make a U.S. tax deductible contribution to the American Friends, go to this link. If you are considering a contribution, please note that neither the GWPF nor its American Friends affiliate accepts gifts from energy businesses, or from anyone with a significant interest in an energy business.